Monthly Archives: April 2016

Wild Horses

I recently interviewed Castle McLaughlin, a cultural anthropologist and Curator of North American Ethnography at Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University, and founding member of the Nokota® Horse Conservancy (http://www.nokotahorse.org/cms/). I wanted to get her take on the relationship between the wild horses she is working to save in North Dakota and the broader history of the dispossession and repatriation of Native ways of life on the Northern Plains. Here is the first of a two-part transcript of that discussion.

PR: Thanks for talking with me, Castle. How did you get involved in the rescue and preservation of wild horses?

CM: It started when I moved to North Dakota in 1986, originally just for the summer. I had finished my PhD course work at Columbia at that time, and I went out to work for the National Park Service at Knife River Indian Villages, which preserves several village sites of the Mandan and Hidatsa—proto-historic into historic.

6502141

Horses grazing at the Theodore Roosevelt National Park. This Park Service advertising photo shows Quarter Horses who now occupy much of the park, not the wild horses McLaughlin has worked to preserve.

Early Sept. of 1986 the Park Service was planning round ups at Theodore Roosevelt National Park, in southwestern North Dakota, as they do periodically, of both bison and wild horses, and they needed riders for the roundup. Having ridden my whole life, I was detailed over there to participate in that roundup.

That particular roundup turned out to be a life changing experience. Originally, in a very negative way, because it was brutal. They rounded up several bands of horses—stallions and mares and their offspring, and they were taken to a local livestock sales facility and were sold at public auction about ten days after the roundup.

My heart went out to one particular stallion there. He was a seven-year-old blue roan. He was just desperate to escape, and kept climbing the rails of the pen.

mare

McLaughlin’s first rescue—a blue roan black with sweat, in the holding corral at the 1986 auction. [Photo: Castle McLaughlin]

They didn’t even bother to separate the bands in the corral; they just put them all in there together and so these stallions are kind of fighting each other, and there were a lot of injuries and some deaths. But this one roan stallion was trying so hard to get away-he was sweating so much that he looked jet black. He was the subject of special cruelty; every time he would rear, the round-up crew would give him a shot with an electric prod. I decided I was going to buy that stallion and turn him back into the park—partly because no one in the Park Service can tell one horse from another!

When I went to that auction, I was really stricken. All of the horses were very wild. They had never been that close to human beings, and they were all terrified. They had hardly eaten or drunk water since the round-up and many were injured. I knew that the buyers were almost all kill buyers before I went, and so I really wanted to buy that stallion.

PR: “Kill buyers?”

CM: Yes, they bought horses for meat, for dog food, and so the way they sold these horses was by the pound. They would run in, say, three or four stallions at a time and then they would sell the whole group by weight. So, my stallion comes into the arena with four other stallions and I start bidding, and at some point the auctioneer stops in the middle of the whole thing, points me out in front of everybody and says, “Young woman, what are you bidding on?” And I said, “I just want the big one, the blue roan.” So I kept bidding and I finally got the horse. When I went the pens behind the sale barn afterwards, I stood there looking at that stallion, thinking, “How in the hell am I actually going to do this?” Here is a horse that’s never been touched and I didn’t want to ask for any help from the staff, they were a rough bunch.

sale barn

The 1986 auction barn. [Photo: Castle McLaughlin]

But then these two guys walked up and asked, “What’d you buy that stallion for?” At first, I was kind of hostile because I thought they were kill buyers, but it turned out that they were Leo and Frank Kuntz, from Linton ND, and they were interested in the horses to breed with their horses because they were involved in these cross-country races and the wild park horses had terrific legs and feet and stamina So they were buying them to cross breed, and to save some of them. So my stallion went home with them.

PR: What did you do next?

CM: Soon after, I applied to the Park Service for a research grant to answer the questions raised by this experience: “where do these horses come from? How long have they been there? What’s their management history, and why are they getting rid of them? I was helped by Tom Tescher, a retired national rodeo cowboy and local rancher. He was appointed to be my advisor. Tom had actually been watching these horses for something like 30 years as kind of a hobby.

mare and foal

A wild mare and foal at the Leo Kuntz Ranch, ND. [Photo: Castle McLaughlin]

He would go out once or twice a year with these little spiral notebooks to make notes about the social organization of the herds. He had given different numbers to the stallion bands and had developed a method of numbering to identify the stallions and mares. Tom took me out into the park and taught me where to hide to see these horses when they watered.

PR: What did you discover in your research?

CM: After three years of study, half of it in the field, I concluded that the park had accidently fenced in some of the last wild horses from the region. I found some very interesting historical documentation that suggest that these horses descend in part from the horses that were confiscated from Sitting Bull and other Lakota people who surrendered at Fort Buford in ND in 1881. These were the last of the holdouts who had gone to Canada after the Little Bighorn fight. They surrendered their horses and guns—that was the normal protocol. That happened to all those Cheyenne and Lakota war bands.

IMG_7442

Lakota drawing of a “Paint,” circa. 1913. Castle McLaughlin comments, “it is a pattern of Paint (in this case tobiano which is white body with darker blocks “over” the white) that Indians called “Medicine Hat” because of the darker head and ears. They considered parti-colored horses (and other things) to have distinctive or more connections to spirit powers—for lack of a better phrase.[VAULT.oversize.Ayer.Art.Sioux.Indian Newberry Library, Ayer Collection]

Usually, the army would confiscate their horses and then sell them in St. Paul, trailing them over there and selling them and using the money to purchase farm and ranching equipment for the Native people on the new reservations. But in this case, the local traders at Ft. Buford bought these confiscated Indian horses and eventually they ended up in the herd of an open-range rancher, a French nobleman named the Marquis de Mores, who had moved out west to raise cattle and eventually innovated a method for slaughtering beef locally and shipping them by refrigerated rail cars to the east.

THRO_00185

The Marquis de Mores.

He was a military officer and a horseman, and he heard about these horses at Ft. Buford. I guess that fired his imagination, being a European. He thought these horses must have a lot of stamina; they must have a lot of valuable characteristics because they had survived all those traumatic years fighting [during the Plains Wars].

He bought all the mares from these confiscated herds and took them back to his ranch, where the Theodore Roosevelt Park is nowadays, and he raised those horses on the open range. His idea was to use them as a foundation herd to cross with European breeds so that he could retain the good qualities of these horses. He broke a number of these horses and he and his wife rode these Indian horses. When he left, he sold a large group of them to a nearby rancher. Before he left, he had many photographs taken of the horses, so we know what they looked like.

PR: And what did they look like?

CM: They looked just like the horses in the park and their offspring that Leo was raising: The main colors were black, grey, blue roans and red roans, a few paints, but very few or no chestnuts, bays, the common colors of quarter horses. Same conformation. In short, the horses in the historic photographs look exactly like these horses!

PR: So, by observing them in the wild and seeing their offspring, and comparing that with the archival evidence of the photographs, we are able to know something about the animals and the important role they play in our collective histories.

PR: It sounds to me like you have historical evidence that some of Sitting Bull’s horses are the ancestors of these horses your group is protecting. Is that right?

CM: Yes, that’s right.

PR: And, in a way, this is repatriation?

logo2

To be continued . . . .

Archival Cooperatives

wind river museum billboard

Screen capture from “Lived History” of the future home of the Wind River museum.

For the Wind River community, a physical archive of their cultural patrimony is still off in the distance. Scarce resources have been parceled out to more pressing concerns. But the advent of digital archiving technologies has given the Shoshoni and Arapaho people who live there a vital opportunity to begin the process of archiving their traditions for tribal members’ access via a virtual collection of the precious items of material culture being held at the Field Museum in Chicago.

Across the country, tribal communities and non-Native institutions have begun to join forces in similar efforts at virtual repatriation. At Dartmouth, which houses the papers of the eighteenth-century Mohegan minister and activist, Samson Occom (1723-1792) a decade-long project of reclamation will reach fruition this fall, when the Occom Circle Project is officially launched. Back in 2005, while preparing a presentation on the Occom archive at a gathering of alumni and Mohegan tribal members, English professor Ivy Schweitzer realized that digital technology was mature enough to sustain a cooperative archival celebration of Samson Occom’s life and work. Joining with Mohegan tribe linguist Stephanie Fielding and faculty in Dartmouth’s Native American Studies Program, Schweitzer received a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities to create a Scholarly Digital Edition of the Occom materials.

occom circle

Yet the site seeks to be much more than a digital version of a traditional special collections department. As its mission statement explains,

The Occom Circle does not merely replicate a conventionally printed edition of Occom’s collected works in digital form. Rather, employing the latest advances in digital markup technology, it offers users an expansive view of his world by including works written by Occom, but also about him and his activities by the members of his extensive and international circle of associates . . . [including] . . . Eleazar Wheelock, mastermind of Indian education and missionizing; and Joseph Johnson, Occom’s brother-in-law and fellow Mohegan activist. Using the innovations offered by digital technology to cluster documents, search over multiple fields, and provide facsimiles and images, this digital edition places Occom at the center of a broad network of historical relations, allowing us to better appreciate the cultural world he inhabited and shaped.

By providing free online access to a variety of works by Occom and others in the form of digital images and modernized transcriptions, and by placing them in their broader social and cultural contexts, the site allows visitors to search “within documents for elements such as people, places, organizations, events,” and to access relevant links digital archives of related material.

The American Antiquarian Society has just published another, more modest, virtual archive. “From English to Algonquin: Early New England Translations” is really more of a digital exhibit of seventeenth and eighteenth century texts written in Algonquian dialects.aas algonquin

Curated by Kimberly Pelkey, Head of Readers’ Services at the American Antiquarian Society, the exhibition “grew out of Kim’s own interest in her Nipmuc heritage and her desire to learn more about the texts that now provide the basis for many tribal language reclamation projects.” Aided by AAS staffers Molly Hardy and Dan Boudreau, Kim Pelkey has created a laguage reclamation source for local tribal communities like the Wôpanâak, the Mohegan, and her own Nipmuc nations.

Other elite institutions have also begun the long-overdue process of making their vast holdings in Native written archival materials available to tribal communities and the general public. Especially promising is The Yale Indian Papers Project, which serves as a repository for a collaboratively collected and curated electronic database known as The New England Indian Papers Series.

yale papers

A recent Mellon Foundation grant has allowed the project to expand, and “approximately 4,500 manuscripts held at the Massachusetts State Archives will be imaged and made available to the public on two digital platforms, the Yale Indian Papers Project’s New England Indian Papers Series and Harvard Radcliffe’s Digital Archive of Native American Petitions Project.” yale ission

Significantly, the Yale Indian Papers Project has enlisted Native consultants. The Project website notes, for example, “Cheryll Holley, chief of the Hassanamisco band of the Nipmuc Nation, Cedric Woods, director of UMass’ Institute for New England Native American Studies, and scholars from the Mashpee and Aquinnah communities will select and transcribe documents that are particularly significant with respect to the history and culture of Massachusetts Native people, documents touching on important events within individual communities as well larger themes affecting Massachusetts and New England Native people as a whole.”

More on archives and the ethics of archiving Native materials in future posts!

“Lived History”

A recent acquaintance from the Wind River Reservation, Reinette Tendore, shared with me her community’s efforts to build a museum to house repatriated artifacts. I got to know Reinette and her husband, Lee, at the recent Newberry Library Consortium in American Indian Studies workshop. Reinette is a member of the Northern Arapaho Nation, who share Wind River with the Eastern Shoshoni Nation. The two nations haven’t always gotten along—in fact, they are not traditionally associated with the same location in pre-reservation times. Lee tells me the Northern Arapaho were living near Estes Park, Colorado when the reservation was formed. Over the years, however, relations between the two tribes have changed for the better. In fact, Reinette’s husband is Shoshoni and they are raising their daughter to understand both tribal histories.

When I told her about “The Repatriation Files,” she said she had just the film for me. “Lived History: The Story of the Wind River Virtual Museum” was produced in 2013 by Wind River community members for Wyoming PBS to tell the story of their visit to the Field Museum in Chicago, where they were given access to objects of cultural patrimony. (see “Lived History”)

lived history

“Lived History”

In the film, elders from both nations describe and comment on the making and use of objects that the filmmakers then digitized as part of a virtual archive to be used by the Wind River residents to strengthen their ties with the past, tradition, and history.

An important factor in the health of indigenous communities is the complex relationship that obtains between their languages and material culture. You really can’t have one without the other. Here again, the situation at Wind River is especially difficult. Eastern Shoshoni people speak a language based in the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family and Northern Arapaho is an Algonquian tongue. Reinette’s nation has somewhere between 250 and 1000 speakers. Her husband’s Shoshoni relatives can boast of similar numbers of speakers, but perhaps only a couple of hundred people over 50 could be considered fluent. Still, the Eastern Shoshoni at Wind River have embarked on a successful language revitalization program, and more and more children are learning the language.

wind river museum billboard

So, as the people of Wind River work hard to maintain their languages, they also have begun to rekindle a long-standing dream—building a center of shared cultural patrimony on the reservation to serve as a repository of knowledge for the generations to come.

The film ends poignantly, with the elders on the bus ride home through the Wyoming plains, pondering questions about repatriation. The late Robert Goggles expresses the central tension involved in repatriation: “The articles [in the museum] belong to my ancestors. They should be taken back and put somewhere so that (some of them), we could make use of them. Some of them, we can’t use them and we’ll take them out and bury them . . .  [I have] mixed emotions, you might say. Cause with me, its not alright with me.”

For now, the Wind River community has a virtual archive of these objects, filmed in three dimensions, from every angle, now digitized and available to the reservation’s teachers and students for consultation as they go about the work of reviving their languages and re-connected with the material cultures that supported them.

Reinette tells me that another film is out about Wind River and should be available for viewing in a few months: “Here is the trailer that is now out. It is still premiering in places across the U.S. and should be out by the end of this year for all to watch. The trailer is really good and makes us all excited to see. https://vimeo.com/135290295