Tag Archives: globalization

The Laissez Faire Ethics of Global Culture Brokers

Investors in indigenous art anxiously awaited last week’s auction of the Rainer Werner Bock collection of Native Hawaiian materials. Gathered over a twenty-year period, it numbers some 1000 items, ranging from pounding stones to medicine bundles.

A visit to the online auction catalog of the esteemed French auction house Aguttes yields page after page of objects, each within its own little well-lit, immaculately photographed rectangle. Here, a huge run of grinding stones dating to the 18th century; there, a “stone medicine bowl,” its dating and method of “collection,” uncertain. The sale last week contained items of great historic interest as well, including a spear said to have been collected by Captain Cook during his third expedition in 1779/80, and a flag from the Hawaiian monarchic period.

Hawaiian flag, Monarchy Period (c. 1795-1893).

But where the avid collector of “antiquities” sees bargains and objet d’art to decorate a home, others find evidence of a forced diaspora of the stuff of Kanaka Maoli life.

One item in particular caught my eye, a “ceremonial bundle” from the nineteenth century. Is a religious utensil art? How was it acquired? If one community wishes to treat their religious objects as museum pieces, must all others?

Needless to say, not everyone was happy with the proposed sale. Native Hawaiian Edward Halealoha Ayau took a day off from sightseeing with his family on a European vacation to picket the auction house. When reached by phone on Hawaii’s KITV Island News, Ayau explained, “All we are asking is for the sellers to provide us with documentation that demonstrated that these were legitimate Hawaiian objects that were collected lawfully.  . . . All we asked them to do was to prove the provenance of these items, ‘prove that you had informed consent to collect them, and if you have then you are free to do with them as you please.’”

All we are asking is for the sellers to provide us with documentation that demonstrated that these were legitimate Hawaiian objects that were collected lawfully

Edward Halealoha Ayau

 

 

 

 

This is not the first time that a prestigious Paris auction house has been embroiled in controversy over trafficking in indigenous cultural objects.

Back in 2013, the Néret-Minet Tessier & Sarrou auction house in Paris put into bidding a collection of rare Hopi and Navajo ceremonial masks whose provenance was unclear. When concerned tribal members tried to take the auctioneers to court, French legal authorities held that the Hopi tribe had no legal standing in France. From the point of view of some outside observers, this ruling meant that the Paris market in antiquities had become “a safe haven for any indigenous cultural property.” The auction netted $1.2 million. 70 of these masks remain in private hands.

Later that year, another Paris dealer offered yet another set of masks, but this time, as the LA Times reported, “the L.A.-based Annenberg Foundation phoned in anonymous bids, landing 21 Hopi masks and three sacred Apache headdresses for $530,000, in order to return them to the tribes.” http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/culture/la-et-cm-native-american-hopi-sacred-mask-auction-paris-20140627-story.html

In 2016, Indian Country Today featured an interview with Tlingit Athabascan artist Crystal Worl, who was in Paris for an exhibition of her work. Once again, art dealers in the French capital were auctioning off Hopi masks. Among the lots were also a set of Haida and Tlingit ceremonials items. Worl joined other protesters outside the auction house, explaining to ICT reporter Dominique Godrèche,

My grandmother wanted me to be there; she knew what the Tlingit items meant. So I joined the protest, standing outside, holding signs. Hoping that this protest would reach the buyers, and they would give back the pieces to the community. We want them, because we are striving, as a culture . . . . [S]tanding there, at the auction, and seeing my ancestors was frustrating . . . I went to the Northwest coast room to see the objects, and they saw me: I wanted them to know that we are there for them, and we will wait for them. Their cultural value is essential to us: stories are related to each object, passed on to the next generation. All the pieces contain the spirits of the ancestors who created them. There is no Tlingit word for art, as our ceremonial objects are living beings. So this event was unfair; the items are our ancestors, they belong to our communities.

https://indiancountrymedianetwork.com/culture/arts-entertainment/ceremonial-objects-trickster-skateboards-and-protesting-an-auction-tlingit-artist-crystal-worl-in-paris/

I went to the Northwest coast room to see the objects, and they saw me: I wanted them to know that we are there for them, and we will wait for them.

Crystal Worl

Chrystal Worl (second from left) and others protesting in Paris. (Indian Country Today, Csia-Nitassin)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yet amidst this seemly wholesale disregard for indigenous cultural sovereignty, there is still some good news to report. The April 5-7 auction did not go well for Aguttes. As Thomas Admanson of the Associated Press reported last week, “only two of the least valuable lots sold for 10,455 euros ($11,134). The auctioneers believe “buyers apparently were scared off by a protest . . .”

Because the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) does not cover items in private collections, and is not recognized outside the U.S., Article 31 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People offers guidance on how these issues should be handled in the global art marketplace:

Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and cultures, including human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, knowledge of the properties of fauna and flora, oral traditions, literatures, designs, sports and traditional games and visual and performing arts. They also have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property over such cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions. 2. In conjunction with indigenous peoples, States shall take effective measures to recognize and protect the exercise of these rights.

When courts and ethnics guidelines fail, it becomes the work of everyday people like Edward Halealoha Ayau and Crystal Worlreally all of us—to remind others of their responsibilities to the living cultures of the indigenous world.

 

 

Globalism and Indigenous Environmentalism

In January of this year, Isidro Baldenegro López was gunned down at his home village, Coloradas de la Virgen in Chihuahua, Mexico. He was shot six times, in the chest and abdomen, by a man authorities identified but could not capture. Just out of jail, he had returned to his family, against his better judgment. He knew firsthand that Chihuahua is a violent place. Drug trafficking and widespread corruption have made it, like several other Mexican border provinces, a militarized zone where the rule of law is only a dream.

But Isidro Baldenegro was not a narcotrafficker or corrupt official. He was a subsistence farmer and community leader of Mexico’s indigenous Tarahumara people in the country’s Sierra Madre mountain region. His 15-month prison term was handed down because he organized  protests against illegal logging there. In fact, in 2005, he was awarded   the Goldman Prize for his environmental work.

Isidro Baldenegro

Mr. Baldengro’s murder marked a horrible anniversary for indigenous peoples of the western hemisphere. Just a year before, fellow Goldman Prize winner, Berta Caceres— a member of the Lenca community in Honduras—was shot to death in her own home. She had been protesting the Agua Zarca Dam, a joint project of Honduran company Desarrollos Energéticos SA (DESA) and Chinese state-owned Sinohydro, the world’s largest dam developer. Like many such projects on Native land, Agua Zarca, “was pushed through without consulting the indigenous Lenca people—a violation of international treaties governing indigenous peoples’ rights” (Goldman Prize, http://www.goldmanprize.org/recipient/berta-caceres/)

Berta Caceres at the banks of the Gualcarque River in the Rio Blanco region of western Honduras.

According to the Goldman Environmental Foundation, the dam threatened to “cut off the supply of water, food and medicine for hundreds of Lenca people and violate their right to sustainably manage and live off their land.” Sadly, Beta Caceres and Isidro Baldenegro are the norm, rather than the exception. All told, 122 activists were murdered across Latin America in 2015. Being indigenous and caring for one’s homeland has clearly become a lethal occupation.

All told, 122 activists were murdered across Latin America in 2015

The NGO Global Witness has produced a chart based on statistics that record violence against environmental activists around the globe. It highlights,  in vivid color, the awful concentration of violence the western hemisphere’s indigenous peoples bear in this global war for resources.

It would be easy for citizens of the United States to write these deaths off as yet more Latin American “instability,” if it were not for the parallels these events share with those in North America. A recent post on this blog detailed  how the government’s about-face on the Dakota Access Pipeline brought with it more violence to the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River reservations, this time in the form of BIA police .

Yet anyone familiar with American history knows that this is standard operating procedure for local, state, and federal governments when they heed the call of extractive industries and their powerful investors. In the late nineteenth-century, progressive activists like Elizabeth Palmer Peabody (who opened the first English-language kindergarden in the U.S.) constantly warned their eastern readers that the “management” of Indian Country actually involved a corrupt cabal of territorial governments, the federal authorities, and businessmen with vested interests in Indian lands. Writing to the Minister Lyman Abbot, Peabody explained,

The Indian Agency is “the most effectual instrumentality of a formidable Ring, composed of the still unreformed civil service on the frontiers, and the majority of the frontier population, who deprecate Indian civilization, and work against it with an immense mercantile interest scattered all over the Union, that fattens on the CONTRACTS FOR SUPPLIES, which is the breath of life to this well-named ‘Hidden Power.’” (“Sarah Winnemucca’s practical solution . . .” 1886).

In an era marked by non-Indian backlash against globalization, the sacrifices made by Native peoples across the hemisphere are worth noting. As Native legal scholar Duane Champagne recently reminded us, indigenous peoples can very well be likened to the “canaries in the coal mine” of democracy . What is happening at Standing Rock is part and parcel to what has rocked the Tarahumara communities in the Sierra Madre and the Lenca people of Honduras.

It is high time Americans saw their indigenous neighbors as partners, not adversaries. We are all in this together, battling  a global economy that has no care for our air and water, and prizes only what it can extract from our land—its beneficiaries hiding their profits in offshore accounts and manipulating the franchise the people have so desperately fought to win.